<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freemium - Shmeemium</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/</link>
	<description>Building the mixable web, one piece at a time</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Semeria</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>David Semeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Kirk.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My point is very straightforward: you can charge 3% of your active client base $10/month, or you can charge 100% of them &lt;i&gt;on average&lt;/i&gt; 30¢/month. The underlying economics of the business remain unchanged, with users still being able to try the product for free (up to a certain level of usage).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My subsequent post &lt;a href=&#39;http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/07/kamikaze-marketing/&#39; rel="nofollow"&gt;Kamikaze Marketing&lt;/a&gt; goes into a bit more detail on how the benefits of the free part of freemium can still be had without incurring the burden of subscriptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Kirk.</p>
<p>My point is very straightforward: you can charge 3% of your active client base $10/month, or you can charge 100% of them <i>on average</i> 30¢/month. The underlying economics of the business remain unchanged, with users still being able to try the product for free (up to a certain level of usage).</p>
<p>My subsequent post <a href=&#39;http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/07/kamikaze-marketing/&#39; rel="nofollow">Kamikaze Marketing</a> goes into a bit more detail on how the benefits of the free part of freemium can still be had without incurring the burden of subscriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KirkWard</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>KirkWard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I disagree with your point that the price of the premium service has to be set artificially high.  The cost of acquiring the free subscriber and enticing them to stay subscribed is the same cost any marketer would have in building a list.  Cost of acquisition plus cost of maintenance.  You point that freemium is a marketing model is most apt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with your point that the price of the premium service has to be set artificially high.  The cost of acquiring the free subscriber and enticing them to stay subscribed is the same cost any marketer would have in building a list.  Cost of acquisition plus cost of maintenance.  You point that freemium is a marketing model is most apt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Semeria</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>David Semeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Thanks very much Tom!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sure, as I mentioned above, it&#39;s a self-fulfilling prophecy. Generally roll-outs like this can work when users perceive genuine value and so are more willing overcome their unwillingness to change habits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#39;s happened many times before. Off the top of my head, I might suggest when Excel came from nowhere and caused Lotus 123 users to change their behaviour. They only did this because the benefits of using Excel far outweighed the burden of its learning curve.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The switch to micro-billing involves significantly less pain (if any). The key is that people should really value the benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much Tom!</p>
<p>Sure, as I mentioned above, it&#39;s a self-fulfilling prophecy. Generally roll-outs like this can work when users perceive genuine value and so are more willing overcome their unwillingness to change habits.</p>
<p>It&#39;s happened many times before. Off the top of my head, I might suggest when Excel came from nowhere and caused Lotus 123 users to change their behaviour. They only did this because the benefits of using Excel far outweighed the burden of its learning curve.</p>
<p>The switch to micro-billing involves significantly less pain (if any). The key is that people should really value the benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom piamenta</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>tom piamenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Very interesting!  &lt;br&gt;If microbilling reaches critical mass a snow ball effect can follow, but "educating" the market, to gain this mass, could be quite ... well, impossible?&lt;br&gt;thanks for a great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting!  <br />If microbilling reaches critical mass a snow ball effect can follow, but &#8220;educating&#8221; the market, to gain this mass, could be quite &#8230; well, impossible?<br />thanks for a great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tab Sweep — the Web &#124; dv8-designs</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Tab Sweep — the Web &#124; dv8-designs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] age is now measured in (gasp) weeks. Item: Content is a Service Business by Andrew Savikas. Item: Freemium - Shmeemium by David Semeria. Item: Women in Open Source — the canary in the coal mine by David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] age is now measured in (gasp) weeks. Item: Content is a Service Business by Andrew Savikas. Item: Freemium - Shmeemium by David Semeria. Item: Women in Open Source — the canary in the coal mine by David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tab Sweep — the Web &#124; Design Website Easy</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Tab Sweep — the Web &#124; Design Website Easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] age is now measured in (gasp) weeks. Item: Content is a Service Business by Andrew Savikas. Item: Freemium - Shmeemium by David Semeria. Item: Women in Open Source — the canary in the coal mine by David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] age is now measured in (gasp) weeks. Item: Content is a Service Business by Andrew Savikas. Item: Freemium - Shmeemium by David Semeria. Item: Women in Open Source — the canary in the coal mine by David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Semeria</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>David Semeria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew, I would have been quite happy to carry on this discussion over at your &lt;a href=&#39;http://blog.phanfare.com/2009/07/freemium-did-not-work-for-phanfare&#39; rel="nofollow"&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;. Nevertheless, since we&#39;re here...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You&#39;re right that usage-billing is less appealing for storage. But this applies just as much in the real world. I had to pay a guy for five years to store a kart I never used - but we had an agreement and business is business. Amazon S3 also works along similar lines - however I would say it&#39;s not a subscription. You pay for what you use, not a flat rate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The whole point about micro-billing is that everything is a service. It&#39;s clear &lt;a href=&#39;http://phanfare.com&#39; rel="nofollow"&gt;Phanfare&lt;/a&gt; is not just a big disk drive in the sky. Sure, storage is a part of the service, but there is a lot of value-added around that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By asking people to only pay for the what they use, and allowing the payments to trend to zero as usage falls off, you create a lower hurdle for sign-up. And when there are no free users, it means that the average price for everyone can be lower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, I would have been quite happy to carry on this discussion over at your <a href=&#39;http://blog.phanfare.com/2009/07/freemium-did-not-work-for-phanfare&#39; rel="nofollow">blog</a>. Nevertheless, since we&#39;re here&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#39;re right that usage-billing is less appealing for storage. But this applies just as much in the real world. I had to pay a guy for five years to store a kart I never used - but we had an agreement and business is business. Amazon S3 also works along similar lines - however I would say it&#39;s not a subscription. You pay for what you use, not a flat rate.</p>
<p>The whole point about micro-billing is that everything is a service. It&#39;s clear <a href=&#39;http://phanfare.com&#39; rel="nofollow">Phanfare</a> is not just a big disk drive in the sky. Sure, storage is a part of the service, but there is a lot of value-added around that.</p>
<p>By asking people to only pay for the what they use, and allowing the payments to trend to zero as usage falls off, you create a lower hurdle for sign-up. And when there are no free users, it means that the average price for everyone can be lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erlichson</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>erlichson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Micropayments hardly solves the problem for a photo and video sharing service. Even if you never come back again, we would still need to store your stuff. basically, we would need to charge you a usage fee each month, and that is called a subscription. hence, you are back to square one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;as the point point of the paid users subsidizing the free ones, this is true. If the substitute is to advertise, then that too would need to be paid for by the paying customers. The difference is that a free level of service cannibalizes your paying business, while advertising does not. If i can fill up on the free samples, I don&#39;t need to buy dinner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Micropayments hardly solves the problem for a photo and video sharing service. Even if you never come back again, we would still need to store your stuff. basically, we would need to charge you a usage fee each month, and that is called a subscription. hence, you are back to square one.</p>
<p>as the point point of the paid users subsidizing the free ones, this is true. If the substitute is to advertise, then that too would need to be paid for by the paying customers. The difference is that a free level of service cannibalizes your paying business, while advertising does not. If i can fill up on the free samples, I don&#39;t need to buy dinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamikaze Marketing &#8212; LM Framework</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamikaze Marketing &#8212; LM Framework</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 22:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] MarketingFreemium - ShmeemiumNew Video: Mixing and Sharing Images in TwigglerFeedback: TwigglerFeedback: LM FrameworkFeedback: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MarketingFreemium - ShmeemiumNew Video: Mixing and Sharing Images in TwigglerFeedback: TwigglerFeedback: LM FrameworkFeedback: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alper Çu?un</title>
		<link>http://lmframework.com/blog/2009/06/freemium/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Alper Çu?un</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmframework.com/blog/?p=158#comment-32</guid>
		<description>If anybody is interested in working with us, we at Tipit &lt;a href="http://tipit.to" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tipit.to&lt;/a&gt; would be willing to try this out. We have most of the infrastructure in play and it looks it has a lot of alignment with our concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anybody is interested in working with us, we at Tipit <a href="http://tipit.to" rel="nofollow">http://tipit.to</a> would be willing to try this out. We have most of the infrastructure in play and it looks it has a lot of alignment with our concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
